Jeff Giulietti, MPT, ATC, OCS, CSCS, COMT, FAAOMPT
Michael Young, DPT, OCS, CSCS
Rachel Wright, DPT, OCS, CLT-LANA
Logan Vashon, DPT
Hailey Davis DPT
Hailey Davis, DPT
Ashley Schlebler DPT ATC(4)
Ashley Schleber, DPT, ATC
Drew Peterschmidt(1)
Drew Peterschmidt, SPT, CSCS
Montana Kaiyala (2)
Montana Kaiyala, SPT

Main Clinic: Heritage Courtyard • 54 Oakway Center • Eugene, OR 97401 • 541-687-7005

Downtown Satellite:1410 Oak Street, Suite 100  Eugene, OR 97401 • 541-345-2064

 Two Locations to Serve You:   CLICK HERE FOR MAP TO CLINIC

What is Manual Therapy?

A clinical approach utilizing skilled, specific hands-on techniques, including but not limited to manipulation/mobilization, used by the physical therapist to diagnose and treat soft tissues and joint structures for the purpose of modulating pain; increasing range of motion (ROM); reducing or eliminating soft tissue inflammation; inducing relaxation; improving contractile and non-contractile tissue repair, extensibility, and/or stability; facilitating movement; and improving function.1,2 (Definition from American Academy of Orthopedic Manual Physical Therapy (AAOMPT) and American Physical Therapy Association (APTA).

WHEN IS MANUAL THERAPY USED?

Research coming out of Australia has demonstrated significantly better outcomes for patients who have a “multi-modal approach.” This means when manual therapy is used in conjunction with other forms of therapy, such as exercise, proprioception training, etc., compared to manual therapy used alone. 6

Type of Manual Therapy we provide:

MOBILIZATION / MANIPULATION

The AAOMPT, APTA, and IFOMT (International Federation of Orthopedic Manual Therapy) define this as “a manual therapy technique comprised of a continuum of skilled passive movements to joints and/or related soft tissues that are applied at varying speeds and amplitudes, including a small amplitude/high velocity therapeutic movement.”7 It is described by Grievesas “the attempt at restoration of full, painless joint function by rhythmic, repetitive, passive movements within the patient’s tolerance and within the voluntary and accessory range, and graded according to examination findings.”1 Mobilization may affect a whole vertebral region or may be localized to a single segment. Manipulation is associated with a high velocity, low amplitude therapeutic movement. 1,2

MUSCLE ENERGY TECHNIQUE (MET)

Originally developed by Fred L. Mitchell, Sr., D.O., FAAO and T. J. Ruddy, D.O., this technique is defined as a “direct manipulative procedure that uses a voluntary contraction of the patient’s muscles against a distinctly controlled counterforce from a precise position and in a specific direction. This is considered an active technique, as opposed to a passive technique where only the clinician does the work. In contrast to joint mobilization, this technique engages the joint restriction barrier but does not stress it. MET may also be used to lengthen shortened muscles, reduce localized edema, and mobilize restricted joints.”3

STRAIN-COUNTERSTRAIN

Originally developed by Lawrence Jones, D.O., FAAO, this technique is defined as “a passive positional procedure that places the body in a position of greatest comfort, thereby relieving pain by reduction and arrest of inappropriate proprioceptor activity that maintains somatic dysfunction.”5 This technique is uniquely different from other manual techniques as it is considered an indirect technique as positioning occurs opposite the restricted barrier and is thus very comfortable for the patient, even in the acute stage.

SOFT TISSUE MOBILIZATION (STM) / MYOFASCIAL RELEASE (MFR)

STM: restoration of med/lat muscle play, breaking fascial restrictions between muscles and decreasing hypertonus that is associated with muscle tightness. Specific directional manual force is used in the direction of fascial restriction. Functional STM combines active lengthening of the muscle tissue with manual work at the same time.

MFR: similar to STM, but a larger area of tissue is targeted as opposed to very localized primary restrictions.

Research in the Netherlands has demonstrated cadaver dissection analysis of fascia to contain actin and myosin. If this research has validity, one could speculate fascia to be a contractile tissue instead of inert, connective tissue as previously theorized.

REFERENCES
  1. American Academy of Orthopaedic Manual Physical Therapists. www.aaompt.org
    Orthopaedic Manual Therapy: Description of Advanced Clinical Practice1999 pp: 29
  2. American Physical Therapy Association. www.apta.org
  3. Donatelli R, Wooden MJ. Orthopaedic Physical Therapy.
    Churchill Livingstone, NY. 1989 pp: 360, 463
  4. Greives Grieve’s Modern Manual Therapy. Harcourt Publishers Ltd. 1994
  5. Kusunose RS, Wendorf R, Jones L. Strain and Counterstrain Syllabus.
    Jones Institute, Encinitas, CA. 1990 pp: 1
  6. Jull G, Trott P, Potter H, Zito G, Niere K, Emberson J, Marschner I, Richardson C.
    A randomised control trial of
     physiotherapy management of cervicogenic headache.
    2002
     SPINE 27: 1835-1843.
  7. Olson KA. IFOMT 2004: Building Bridges.
    2004 ARTICULATIONS (Official Publication of AAOMPT)
     10 (2) pp: 1,3, 21
  8. Hinz B, Gabbiani G Fibrosis: recent advances in myofibroblast biology and new therapeutic perspectives.
    Fibrosis iology Reports 2010, 2:78
    (Giulietti, rev. 12/2011)